There's a lot to debate about New Thought, or a Higher Conscious. Generally it's a great deal since they are such expansive ideas. It necessitates many, many words to plainly articulate them. We come upon a challenge like attempting to write 1,000 words to explain an image, rather than just showing a picture to you. Unfortunately, when we're dissecting alternate realities like Subjective Reality, there aren't any pictures available. It's all in your thoughts, or while we might see, all inside my head.
As per Subjective Reality, your existing everything (everything that is in your life, and close to you) is there, is manifest (existing) because you wanted it to, or you like it to...e.g. you allowed it, you accepted it, so you currently accept it. This makes people who aren't ready for any other perspective slightly annoyed. The concept is comparable to a wave of belief that I'd been recently riding, so it was kind of chewable for me personally, but I still had some objections which I found necessary to work out.
In Subjective Reality, there exists only "you" within this reality, and anything else is known as a projection of your consciousness. I am a projection of your consciousness, your parents, and your memories are too. This is only a problem as people's interpretation of the word "you," or their perception of themselves is skewed.
So you might ask: If I stop thinking of you, do you stop existing? The answer's, yes, in principle. The problem at this point is that you rarely stop actually thinking about someone, to the extent of that thought actually being blank, absent from the mind, or removed from your mind. Think on that. And if you did completely stop contemplating that individual, how do you "know?" Does that person really exist then? Not as part of your reality...not in "reality."
Really understanding it comes with thinking more about the "one mind," or "one consciousness." When you overcome the this is hokey new age crap objection it is possible to logically agree that ecosystems are one system of "many," and also that energy, in its literal sense as you may know it from 9th-grade Science is circular, or better put, pervasive; it transcends. Ice, water, vapor, push, pull, give, take...all outcomes of energy changing intensity, or passing from a single object to another, but never emerging from nowhere, or vanishing inside the same. It was there, in fact it is there. This phenomenon is widely evident with the many ecosystems that any of us observe living with each other on the earth, and they illustrate that we are all one.
Saturday, November 5, 2011
Can You Manifest Your Desire Using a Secret Biblical Code?
Can you really blend Christianity with New Age thought? Everything can be done, but how well it will be taken is a far better question. James Twyman finds an approach to do simply that as part of his latest book, The Moses Code. The overall idea is the fact that Law of Attraction works as a system of God. In this sense, obviously, God must have to do with all things, the all-knowing creative. In external manifest, God appeared to Moses and divulged to him a quick yet stunning revelation. God shared with Moses that the particular name for this voice talking to him is/was I AM. I AM THAT I AM.
As Twyman indicates, the implications are long and wide! There is not any "name" per se, just an affirmation. An intention of being. Who are you? I AM. Exactly what is that happening before me? I AM. Who can I tell them sent me? Explain that I AM sent you. This revelation becomes the point of interest for "intentions," or declaration of wanted situations, and this offers a very effective association between Christianity and New Thought.
On a personalized level, the spiritual factor that Twyman indicates within the Moses Code intrigues me. Since I was old enough to learn from the Bible on my own, I was always intrigued by the name that God offered to Moses when he asked for it. "I AM THAT I AM. Tell them that I AM sent you." The name becomes an idea that transcends ordinary interpretation. It begets the question of what designed everything. Not who, but what. The greater level produced from focusing on the "I AM," is that it's really a thought. Thought developed all things.
Twyman offers that you state the name of the creator and progress from stages of ego, to soul, and ultimately onto unity with your creator. From "you are," on to "I am." So now your thought is unified along with the creator's, or as an advancement of conscience in yourself will reveal, you are the Creator. YOU ARE. I AM. It’s easily progressed towards the theory of Subjective Reality.
More specific on the subject issue, though, in exploring that vast concept, along with its process to get there, Twyman suggests meditating using the name. Utilizing it to claim that which is a desire of yours, an intention. Just think on the desire, exhale while using the words, "I AM THAT," and inhale while using the words, "I AM." In my experience to this point, merely that act by itself develops concentration, and focus. I've enjoyed using it as a center of attention during my intentional breathing and thought, and as a Christian in my youth, well indoctrinated in the teaching within the Bible, I'm astounded by the link that The Moses Code draws with the Law of Attraction and New Thought.
As Twyman indicates, the implications are long and wide! There is not any "name" per se, just an affirmation. An intention of being. Who are you? I AM. Exactly what is that happening before me? I AM. Who can I tell them sent me? Explain that I AM sent you. This revelation becomes the point of interest for "intentions," or declaration of wanted situations, and this offers a very effective association between Christianity and New Thought.
On a personalized level, the spiritual factor that Twyman indicates within the Moses Code intrigues me. Since I was old enough to learn from the Bible on my own, I was always intrigued by the name that God offered to Moses when he asked for it. "I AM THAT I AM. Tell them that I AM sent you." The name becomes an idea that transcends ordinary interpretation. It begets the question of what designed everything. Not who, but what. The greater level produced from focusing on the "I AM," is that it's really a thought. Thought developed all things.
Twyman offers that you state the name of the creator and progress from stages of ego, to soul, and ultimately onto unity with your creator. From "you are," on to "I am." So now your thought is unified along with the creator's, or as an advancement of conscience in yourself will reveal, you are the Creator. YOU ARE. I AM. It’s easily progressed towards the theory of Subjective Reality.
More specific on the subject issue, though, in exploring that vast concept, along with its process to get there, Twyman suggests meditating using the name. Utilizing it to claim that which is a desire of yours, an intention. Just think on the desire, exhale while using the words, "I AM THAT," and inhale while using the words, "I AM." In my experience to this point, merely that act by itself develops concentration, and focus. I've enjoyed using it as a center of attention during my intentional breathing and thought, and as a Christian in my youth, well indoctrinated in the teaching within the Bible, I'm astounded by the link that The Moses Code draws with the Law of Attraction and New Thought.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)