What's Going on in Subjective Reality, Where's the Line Drawn on Hokey?

There's a lot to debate about New Thought, or a Higher Conscious. Generally it's a great deal since they are such expansive ideas. It necessitates many, many words to plainly articulate them. We come upon a challenge like attempting to write 1,000 words to explain an image, rather than just showing a picture to you. Unfortunately, when we're dissecting alternate realities like Subjective Reality, there aren't any pictures available. It's all in your thoughts, or while we might see, all inside my head.

As per Subjective Reality, your existing everything (everything that is in your life, and close to you) is there, is manifest (existing) because you wanted it to, or you like it to...e.g. you allowed it, you accepted it, so you currently accept it. This makes people who aren't ready for any other perspective slightly annoyed. The concept is comparable to a wave of belief that I'd been recently riding, so it was kind of chewable for me personally, but I still had some objections which I found necessary to work out.

In Subjective Reality, there exists only "you" within this reality, and anything else is known as a projection of your consciousness. I am a projection of your consciousness, your parents, and your memories are too. This is only a problem as people's interpretation of the word "you," or their perception of themselves is skewed.

So you might ask: If I stop thinking of you, do you stop existing? The answer's, yes, in principle. The problem at this point is that you rarely stop actually thinking about someone, to the extent of that thought actually being blank, absent from the mind, or removed from your mind. Think on that. And if you did completely stop contemplating that individual, how do you "know?" Does that person really exist then? Not as part of your reality...not in "reality."

Really understanding it comes with thinking more about the "one mind," or "one consciousness." When you overcome the this is hokey new age crap objection it is possible to logically agree that ecosystems are one system of "many," and also that energy, in its literal sense as you may know it from 9th-grade Science is circular, or better put, pervasive; it transcends. Ice, water, vapor, push, pull, give, take...all outcomes of energy changing intensity, or passing from a single object to another, but never emerging from nowhere, or vanishing inside the same. It was there, in fact it is there. This phenomenon is widely evident with the many ecosystems that any of us observe living with each other on the earth, and they illustrate that we are all one.